McCarter v. Alaska National Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Mick McCarter was employed as a “flag-ger” at a highway construction site for Wilderness Women, Inc. Edward Hanousek, III struck and injured McCarter while driving a vehicle past the site. Wilderness Women, Inc.’s insurance carrier, Alaska National, Inc. (ANI), paid McCarter workers’ compensation benefits amounting to $11,936.
McCarter sued Hanousek for negligence. Because Hanousek himself had few assets, McCarter settled with Hanousek’s insurer for $50,000 (the policy limit) plus Civil Rule 82 attorney’s fees of $7,500. McCarter argued before…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Arctic Structures, Inc. v. WedmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schiel v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Bush v. RichardsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- AIK Selective Self Insurance Fund v. BushKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
- Burke v. Raven Electric, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Sandra J. Rusch v. Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium and Alaska National Insurance Company, Brenda Dockter v. SEARHC and Alaska National Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.