Legal Opinion

McCarter v. Alaska National Insurance Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1994No. S-5746PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Mick McCarter was employed as a “flag-ger” at a highway construction site for Wilderness Women, Inc. Edward Hanousek, III struck and injured McCarter while driving a vehicle past the site. Wilderness Women, Inc.’s insurance carrier, Alaska National, Inc. (ANI), paid McCarter workers’ compensation benefits amounting to $11,936.

McCarter sued Hanousek for negligence. Because Hanousek himself had few assets, McCarter settled with Hanousek’s insurer for $50,000 (the policy limit) plus Civil Rule 82 attorney’s fees of $7,500. McCarter argued before…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Arctic Structures, Inc. v. WedmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schiel v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bush v. RichardsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. AIK Selective Self Insurance Fund v. BushKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Burke v. Raven Electric, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Sandra J. Rusch v. Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium and Alaska National Insurance Company, Brenda Dockter v. SEARHC and Alaska National Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API