Schiel v. Union Oil Co. of California
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
We accepted certification in this case to determine whether the 2004 amendments to AS 283.30.045(a) and AS 28.30.055 violate the plaintiff's right to equal protection or due process under the Alaska Constitution. Applying minimum serutiny, we hold that they do not.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Joseph Schiel sued Union Oil Company of California (UNOCAL or the company) for injuries he suffered when he was working on UNOCAL's Grayling Drilling Platform. Schiel was an employee of Peak Oilfield Services at the time of the injury. He lost two fingers when he was…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nelson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Anderson v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Estate of Teague v. Crossroads Co-op Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.