Highland Park, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtAlcobw, J.
The essential facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff corporation built a house, which it still owns, on lot 19, which it owns in a subdivision developed by it in North Haven. After the house was built, it was found to be located only five feet from the sideline of the lot, whereas the applicable zoning regulations require a minimum sideyard width of ten feet. Another house which the corporation built, and has since sold, on the adjoining lot, was placed twenty-five feet from the boundary line between the two lots so that the houses are actually thirty feet apart.
The plaintiff Leonard…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zieky v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- DeForest & Hotchkiss Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Misuk v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Wil-Nor Corporation v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Booe v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Garibaldi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Smith v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Pollard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.