Legal Opinion

DeForest & Hotchkiss Co. v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 15, 1964PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I

King, C. J.

These two cases were tried together. The first, hereinafter referred to as the appeal, was-an appeal by the plaintiff from the refusal of the-planning and zoning commission of Madison, hereinafter referred to as the commission, to change,, from a residential to an industrial zone, the portion of the plaintiff’s property which extends north from the railroad for a distance of 300 feet.

The second case, hereinafter referred to as the action, was a suit for a declaratory judgment which the plaintiff instituted several months after the-appeal, and during its pendency. The action was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  4. Smith v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  5. St. John's Roman Catholic Church Corp. v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Helbig v. Zoning Commission of Noank Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Town of Lebanon v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  4. Parks v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Hyatt v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API