Legal Opinion

Tire Jockey Service, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2007No. 178 MAP 2004PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

Two inter-related questions are presented for review in the instant appeal: (1) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred by failing to give the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection’s (“DEP”) interpretation of subparagraph (ii) of the definition of “waste” in 25 Pa.Code § 287.1 the deference to which the DEP’s reasonable interpretation of environmental regulations is entitled under Department of Environmental Protection v. North, American Refractories Co., 791 A.2d 461 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002) and (2) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred by finding that Tire Jockey…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Housing Authority of Chester v. Pennsylvania State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Slawek v. BD. OF MED. ED. & LICENSURESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. Forbes Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Alto-Reste Park Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Northwestern Youth Services, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Perry v. State Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Funk v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API