Legal Opinion
Seaboard Tank Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 23, 1985No. Appeal, No. 1148 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Barry,
This appeal results from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUO) which affirmed the decision of an administrative law judge (ALJ) granting the application of Machise Interstate Transportation (Machise) for an amendment to its certificate of public convenience.
Machise is a New Jersey trucking corporation engaged in the transport of petroleum products, operating in Pennsylvania and holding a certificate from the PUC ¡since 1980. In March, 1983, Machise filed an application to amend its certificate in order to expand its authority to transport petroleum…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Moderm Trans. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Hoffman v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Assure Competitive Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Elite Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Chester Water Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- National Retail Transportation, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Tanya J. McCloskey, Acting Consumer Advocate v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.