Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Knez v. Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1934No. 24732. Department OnePublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— Plaintiff sued the city of Seattle and the city comptroller and ex-officio city clerk, setting up two causes of action: (1) To compel the issuance to him of salary warrants for the balance alleged to be due him as a fireman; and (2) to compel the issuance of warrants for the balance alleged to be due R. B. Wells as a fireman, the claim for the latter having been assigned to the plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s first cause of action was abandoned and dismissed. In the second cause of action, findings, conclusions and judgment were entered for the plaintiff. The defendants have appealed.

Wells has held…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Glavey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Lukens v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Stetson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Lynch v. City of North YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Scheller v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. Pike v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. City of Mountlake Terrace v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. Christie v. the Port of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Luker v. CurtisIdaho Supreme Court · 1943

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API