Legal Opinion
CJP Contractors, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 19, 1999No. Nos. 95-126C, 95-786CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
The present consolidated actions were brought pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1994). The contractor, CJP Contractors, Inc. (“CJP”), was default terminated before the contract’s completion date for failure to make progress. In this action, CJP is seeking to convert the termination for default into a termination for the convenience of the government. Defendant, the General Services Administration (“GSA”), argues that the termination for default should be upheld and is seeking $917,539.62 in excess reprocurement costs, administrative…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Melvin Wilner, D/B/A Wilner Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Becho, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation, and General Dynamics Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Libertatia Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- R.P. Wallace, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.