Legal Opinion

Sivley v. Nixon Mining Drill Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of Hamilton County to the Court of Civil Appeals and by certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court.— N. L. Bachman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

This suit was brought by Harry Sivley to recover damages for personal injuries, and. is based upon alleged negligence of the employer company in furnishing him for use, in reaching to oil the overhead shafts and pulleys in the company’s plant, a ladder about eighteen feet in length, the lower end of which ladder was equipped with metal spikes or brads (fixed in the upright posts to prevent the ladder - from sliding) which had worn blunt' and become defective.

The proof shows that plaintiff was at the time of the accident, caused by the ladder slipping from its footing on an oily floor, between…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Cahill v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Jenney Electric Light & Power Co. v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Blundell v. Wm. A. Miller Elevator Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Meador v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Philip Carey Roofing & Manufacturing Co. v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Kelley v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Mozey v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. HensleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Grey Eagle Marble Co. v. PerryTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API