H. G. Bittleston Law & Collection Agency v. Howard
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action brought by the plaintiff corporation against the defendant for an alleged breach of two agreements in writing whereby the defendant employed R.W. Kinsey, the plaintiff's assignor, as her agent, for the purpose of securing certain loans on real property in the county of Los Angeles, and for the securing of which loans she agreed to pay the said R.W. Kinsey commissions amounting to $342. The said agreements are set forth in two counts in the amended complaint, which purports to be verified by the said R.W. Kinsey. A demurrer was interposed by the defendant to the amended…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Silcox v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Patterson & Frisbie v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Christopher v. CondogeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hearst v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Lassen v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Hoffman v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Perlman v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.