Legal Opinion

Silcox v. Lang

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1889No. 12267PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Trinity County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

— This is an action on an injunction bond. The complaint alleges the bringing of the action, the giving and approving of the bond, issuing of the injunction, judgment in favor of the defendants, dissolution of the injunction, and damages. There was a demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled. The defendants answered, denying the right of the plaintiffs to do the acts which they were enjoined from doing in the former action, and denying the damages.

They also answered byway of confession and avoidance as follows; “ That on or about the-day of-, 1885, and before the entry of the judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. ScogginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Taylor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Patterson & Frisbie v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Brooks v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Sterling Bridge Co. v. PearlIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Jackson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API