Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1939No. Crim. 521PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant was charged, in separate counts, with violations of sections 286, 288 and 288a of the Penal Code. A jury found him guilty on each count and he has appealed from the judgment and an order denying a new trial.

On August 16, 1938, the appellant registered at a motel in Bakersfield and was given room 97. A swimming pool was operated in connection with the motel and some new cottages were under construction on a portion of the motel grounds. A man named Best and a man named Cuevas joined the appellant that afternoon and the appellant and Best spent most of the afternoon in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. MetheverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. Lim Dum DongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. People v. HowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. United States v. OlveraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. People v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. McNicholCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API