Legal Opinion

People v. Lim Dum Dong

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1938No. Crim. 1614PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of an assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder. By consent of court the offense was reduced to an assault with a deadly weapon. The defendant admitted that he shot Susie Yamagawa with a revolver, but pleaded that he was irresponsible for the act because he was then insane and therefore did not know the nature of the act which he performed. The question of the sanity of the defendant was tried with a jury. The jury rendered a verdict finding that the defendant was sane at the time of shooting. A motion for new trial was denied. From the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The People v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. People v. MetheverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. SameniegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. People v. GordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. DanaWashington Supreme Court · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API