Legal Opinion

People v. McNichol

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1950No. Crim. 2234PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

This appellant was charged with and convicted of the making and uttering of a check drawn upon a bank in which he had no account, in violation of section 476a of the Penal Code. The evidence shows that defendant, a resident of Connecticut, went to Oakland to visit a sister. There, without eating any breakfast on February 10, 1950, he consumed a pint of whiskey and four cans of beer, after which his sister and her husband took him to the highway and left him there to “hitch-hike” his way to Connecticut. In Vallejo, about 4:30 in the afternoon, he went to the drugstore of a Mr. Manfredi, where…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. SameniegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. In Re the Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. People v. Lim Dum DongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. People v. NolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API