Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 10, 2013No. SC 92961PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZEL M. FISCHER, Judge.

The survivors of Barbara Smith (“the Smiths”) appeal from a judgment, entered following remand from the court of appeals for retrial solely on the issue of punitive damages,1 finding Brown & Williamson To*629bacco Corporation (“B & W”) liable for punitive damages and awarding the Smiths $1.5 million. The Smiths contend that certain evidence admitted by the circuit court was outside the scope of the court of appeals’ prior mandate, and the circuit court erred in overruling their motion for new trial on the grounds of juror nondisclosure. B & W cross-appeals contending that…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. White v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. State v. PurleeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Fleshner v. Pepose Vision Institute, P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. Howard v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  5. Dhyne v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Thomas A. EssSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  2. Wieland v. Owner-Operator Servs., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  3. Poage v. Crane Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Payne v. Fiesta Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Spence v. BNSF Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2018

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API