Legal Opinion

Yarnall v. Knickerbocker Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1922No. 16995PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— September 27, 1919, the respondent, Yarnall, and the appellant, Knickerbocker Company, entered into a written contract whereby the appellant agreed to sell, and the respondent agreed to purchase, a tract of land described as follows:

“North half (N%) of Lot Eighteen, (18) and the North half (N%) of the West one-half of Lot Nineteen (19) Block C, Hartings Addition to the city of Seattle, King county, state of Washington, as per recorded plat thereof in the office of the auditor of said King county, Washington.”

The agreed purchase price of the land was twenty-one hundred dollars. Of this sum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. O'Daniel v. StreebyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carrel v. LuxArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. J. L. Cooper & Co. v. Anchor Securities Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Chicago Title Insurance v. Office of the Insurance CommissionerWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Alexander Myers & Co. v. HopkeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Larson v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API