Legal Opinion
Dieterich v. Rice
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1921No. 16053PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pend Oreille county, Carey, J., entered May 26, 1920,, dismissing an action for rescission, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On March. 21, 1919, the appellants Dieterich entered into a written contract with the respondent, Rice, by the terms of which they agreed to purchase, for a stated consideration, certain specifically described lands situated in Pend Oreille county. The contract contained the following clause:
“This land is sold to second party subject to any and all county roads and with the understanding that he has personally and carefully inspected said premises, and is purchasing the same by said inspection and not' from any other sayings or inducements by first party or his agents, and there has been no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Pittman v. Bloch Queensware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- United States Gypsum Co. v. ShieldsTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Independent Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Becker v. Lagerquist Bros., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Carty v. McMenamin & WardOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Advance-Rumely T. Co., Inc. v. JacobsIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.