Legal Opinion

da Ponte v. Simonian

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1923No. 18242PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Appellant, N. Y. Simonian, was a dealer in Oriental rugs. Respondent, L. B. da Ponte, purchased of him six rugs, a separate value being fixed and agreed upon as to each one. None of them was sold as a second-hand rug. Respondent paid $468 for five of them by trading in five used rugs at the agreed aggregate value of $200 and paying the balance of $268 in cash. The sixth rug, price $750, was paid for in cash. Later, the respondent discovering that one of the rugs for which he paid $110 and the one for which he paid $750 were second-hand rugs. at the time he purchased them, and of greatly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buckeye Buggy Co. v. Montana Stables, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Dieterich v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Czarnikow-Rionda Co. v. West Market Grocery Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. Grunbaum Brothers Furniture Co. v. Humphrey Investment Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Darst v. MedunaWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Marion Steam Shovel Co. v. AukampWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Mason v. MadsonMontana Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API