Legal Opinion

Flagg v. Dare

California Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1895No. 19522PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County dissolving an attachment. The facts aro stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

This is an appeal from an order dissolving an attachment.

It is alleged in the complaint that on the twentieth day of January, 1891, the plaintiff purchased and had issued to him forty shares of the capital stock of the California Rational Bank of San Diego, for which he then paid five thousand dollars, and that he afterward received as dividends on the stock one hundred and twenty-five dollars and no more; that to induce plaintiff to purchase the said stock the defendants, prior to the said purchase, made and executed their agreement in writing, reading as follows:

*484“ San Diego,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. MackeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. Fong ChingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Donnelly v. StruevenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Bank of California v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Duprey v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hale Bros. v. MillikenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Ross v. Gold Ridge Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Eaton v. QueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Greenebaum v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Hamilton v. Baker-Hansen Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API