Greenebaum v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a motion to discharge an attachment. F. J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to discharge an attachment. The action is for breach of a charter-party. At the commence ment of the action the plaintiff had a writ of attachment and caused its levy upon property of the defendant. The defendant moved to quash the writ and vacate the attachment, upon two grounds; first, that the action is not one within section 537 of the Code of Civil Procedure, i. e., it. is not for the direct payment of money; second, that if the case is within said section, then defendant is deprived of the equal protection of the laws because,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Leonis v. EtchepareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- City Street Improvement Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Dunn v. MackeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Donnelly v. StruevenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Force v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Walker v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Lewis v. SteifelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Eaton v. QueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Redwood Fibre Products Co. v. Miller Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.