Hamilton v. Baker-Hansen Manufacturing Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County, denying a motion to dissolve an attachment. Everett J. Brown, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This is an appeal from an order refusing to dissolve an attachment. The complaint shows the action to be one for damages for breach of a written contract between the parties for the conveyance of certain patent rights and . delivery of two automobile starters by defendant to plaintiff. It is alleged that defendant has entirely failed to perform the contract or any part thereof. Ás damages the plaintiff claims $375 as having been advanced to the defendant on account of the contract, and other sums for salaries paid, obligations incurred, and profits which she would otherwise have made. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hale Bros. v. MillikenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- S. C. V. Peat Fuel Co. v. TuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Dwyer v. TestardTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Bank of California v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doud v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Eaton v. QueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Redwood Fibre Products Co. v. Miller Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Hecht v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Stotland v. Mobile Homes Engineering Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1961