Rocky Mountain Gold Mines, Inc. v. Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
A COMPLAINT in ejectment. Plaintiff in error, defendant at trial, claiming as assignee of an instrument denominated a "mining lease and option" of the premises involved, which it pleaded in extenso, and in virtue whereof it was in possession, answered and sought relief as in equity. It set forth what it had paid and performed pursuant to the terms of the lease and option, and contended the substantiality thereof evidenced its good faith, and worked such equity in its favor that defendant in error should be relegated to foreclosure. Consistently, plaintiff in error prayed for dismissal of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Mortgage Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Reitze v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Fairview Mining Corp. v. American Mines & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Borcherdt v. FavorColorado Court of Appeals · 1901
- Taylor v. Briggs, Adm'rSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc. v. FenixMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Wilson v. GoldmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Self v. WattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Cavos v. GeihslerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
- Woznicki v. MusickColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.