Taylor v. Briggs, Adm'r
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard
A suit filed June 1,1931, by Taylor and wife to have an instrument, absolute in terms, under which Briggs and Land Investment Company claim to hold, adjudged to be a mortgage, with privilege to redeem. LeÉerdink holds an interest dependent on title of Briggs and the land company. Continental Oil Company holds an oil lease under Briggs and land company, cancellation of which the Taylors prayed, but during trial it was agreed that the lease should be recognized and follow the title. Bedman, public trustee, has no interest. Judgment of dismissal of the Taylor complaint entered. We refer to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Villa v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Baugher v. MerrymanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Reitze v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Fairview Mining Corp. v. American Mines & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Neves v. PotterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Rocky Mountain Gold Mines, Inc. v. Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Duncan v. Colorado Investment & Realty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Woznicki v. MusickColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Jones v. McKinneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.