Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Goldman
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 21, 1985No. 83CA1325PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN CISE, Judge.
Defendant, William Goldman, appeals from a judgment enforcing protective covenants, requiring him to remove a new fence and restore an old one, and denying his affirmative defenses and counterclaims relating to the fence construction. Plaintiffs cross-appeal from that portion of the judgment relating to their claim for attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the matter with directions.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Castle Mountain Company Wilderness Streams Filing No. 2 (the subdivision) is a rural residential subdivision located in Gun-nison…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Rhue v. Cheyenne Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Rice v. HiltyColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- Rocky Mountain Gold Mines, Inc. v. Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lookout Mountain Paradise Hills Homeowners' Ass'n v. Viewpoint AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rossman v. Seasons at Tiara Rado AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Beaver Creek Property Owners Ass'n v. Bachelor Gulch Metropolitan DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Greenbrier-Cloverdale Homeowners Ass'n v. BacaColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Woodward v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TACOColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.