Legal Opinion

Cavos v. Geihsler

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 16, 1942No. 15,023PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Young

Plaintiff in error Cavos sold a residence property located in the city of Denver, to defendants in error James and Lisetta Geihsler. The property was subject to an encumbrance in the amount of three thousand dollars, which the Geihslers assumed and agreed to pay as part of the purchase price. In addition thereto, the remainder of the purchase price, fifteen hundred dollars, was to be paid, two hundred dollars upon execution of the contract, and thirteen hundred dollars in specified monthly payments. The contract was executed July 1, 1935.

Defendants in error were unable to make all payments…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Gold Mines, Inc. v. Gold, Silver & Tungsten, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. Fairview Mining Corp. v. American Mines & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Pope v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bishop v. BeecherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Butler v. FarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Woods v. Monticello Development Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. Clayton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. Self v. WattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API