Legal Opinion

In re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware: Vanderslice

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 12, 2012No. 428, 2012; Board Case No. 2011-0548-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This attorney disciplinary matter involves charges of professional misconduct against Patrick E. Vanderslice, Esquire (“Vanderslice”). The Board of Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) found that Vanderslice had violated the Delaware Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“Rules”) 1.5(f), 1.15(a) and (b), and 8.4(b) and (c), but not Rule 8.4(d). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) contended that Vanderslice had violated Rule 8.4(d) as well as the other above-cited Rules, and that the Board should have so found. Vanderslice disputes that he violated Rule 8.4(b) (as the Board…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re BaileySupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware FigliolaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. In Re AbbottSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  4. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State LassenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  5. In Re FountainSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VandersliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Matter of a Member of the Bar: LankenauSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API