Legal Opinion

Matter of a Member of the Bar: Lankenau

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 9, 2016No. 73, 2016Published

1Per curiam

This is an attorney disciplinary proceeding. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) filed a Petition alleging multiple ethical violations by S. Harold Lankenau (“Respondent”). A panel of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) found that Respondent engaged in criminal conduct when he misappropriated funds from his employer, over a period of five years, and engaged in dishonest conduct when he lied to his mortgage company and forged his employer’s signature.

The Board issued a report (“Report”) of its findings and recommendation. The Board recommended that Respondent be suspended…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re BaileySupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware FigliolaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. In Re SteinerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  4. Matter of RichSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. In Re DoughtySupreme Court of Delaware · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API