Matter of a Member of the Bar: Lankenau
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Per curiam
This is an attorney disciplinary proceeding. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) filed a Petition alleging multiple ethical violations by S. Harold Lankenau (“Respondent”). A panel of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) found that Respondent engaged in criminal conduct when he misappropriated funds from his employer, over a period of five years, and engaged in dishonest conduct when he lied to his mortgage company and forged his employer’s signature.
The Board issued a report (“Report”) of its findings and recommendation. The Board recommended that Respondent be suspended…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re BaileySupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware FigliolaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- In Re SteinerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Matter of RichSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- In Re DoughtySupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.