Legal Opinion
Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1992No. S-3828PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
Paul M. Luedtke was suspended and then terminated from his employment with Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc. (Nabors) after testing positive for marijuana use in a urinalysis. This court upheld Nabors’ termination of Luedtke in Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc., 768 P.2d 1123 (Alaska 1989) (.Luedtke I), but the case was remanded for a determination of whether Luedtke’s suspension violated the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On remand, the superior court found that Na-bors did not violate the covenant of good faith and fair dealing when it suspended Luedtke.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Golden Eagle Distributing Corporation v. Burroughs Corporation, and Kirkland & EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mitford v. De LasalaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. PressmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Casey v. Semco Energy, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Mitchell v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Ramsey v. City of Sand PointAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.