Legal Opinion

Gamble v. Northstore Partnership

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1995No. S-6489/6969PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Baxter and Yang-Cha Gamble sued North-store Partnership (Northstore) for reformation of a recorded grant of easement. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Northstore, concluding that the Gambles were not entitled to relief.

The Gambles appeal, arguing that North-store’s motion for summary judgment relied upon affirmative defenses which were not specifically pled as required by Alaska Civil Rule 8(c), and therefore, the defenses were waived. In the alternative, the Gambles contend that the trial court should have granted them additional…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Coulson v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. O'CALLAGHAN v. RueAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API