Legal Opinion

Holland v. Union Oil Co. of California, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1999No. S-8273PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Union Oil Company of Alaska (Unocal) demoted Michael Holland for committing a significant error in judgment involving an ethical issue. Holland allegedly asked a subordinate contractor to work on a personal project during work hours and instructed him to use plant materials. Unocal based its decision to demote Holland on information that it gathered during interviews with Holland and four other individuals. Holland sued Unocal for, among other things, breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The superior court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Leikvold v. Valley View Community HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Rood v. General Dynamics Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mitford v. De LasalaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Wilson v. PolletAlaska Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gonsalves v. Nissan Motor Corp. in Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Witt v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Charles v. Interior Regional Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Wade v. Kessler InstituteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API