Legal Opinion

Sterling Products Corporation v. Sterling Products

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 27, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves for an order temporarily enjoining the defendant from using the name “Sterling” or the words “Sterling Products” or a substantially! similar name in its business, and directing the elimination and removal of such words from its signs, advertisements or documents. The amended complaint asks for a permanent injunction of the same kind and for $250,000 damages, based upon allegations that the plaintiff is a New York corporation, that defendant, a Delaware corporation, although doing business in the State of New York, has never obtained a certificate of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  5. William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leo Feist, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Acme Chemical Co. v. DobkinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. United States Blind Stitch MacHine Corp. v. Union Special MacHine Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  4. Powell v. Mobile Cab and Baggage CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Sterling Products Corporation v. Sterling ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API