Legal Opinion
Sterling Products Corporation v. Sterling Products
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 20, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
The plaintiff in each of the above-entitled consolidated actions seeks a permanent injunction restraining the defendant corporations from using the word “Sterling” in their trade-names or businesses. Plaintiff also seeks damages amounting to $250,000. A preliminary injunction was denied by Bright, D. J. of this court, on January 27, 1942. D.C., 43 F.Supp. 548. Defendants now move under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, for summary judgment.
Plaintiff, Sterling Products Corporation, was incorporated in New York in 1925,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of New Mexico, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Coty, Inc. v. Parfums De Grande Luxe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- R. H. MacY & Co. v. Colorado Clothing Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Sterling Products Corporation v. Sterling ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patrick J. O'hanlon v. Hartford Accident And Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Royal Silver Mfg. Co. v. National Silver Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Brown & Bigelow v. Remembrance Advertising Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1951
- Home of the Week, Inc. v. Associated Press, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.