Legal Opinion

William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 9, 1924No. 32PublishedCited by 246 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

Respondent is a corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of pharmaceutical and chemical products. In 1899 it began and has ever since continued to make and sell a liquid preparation of quinine, in combination with other substances, including yerba-santa and chocolate, under the name of Coco-Quinine.

Petitioner also is a pharmaceutical and chemical manufacturer. The Pfeiffer Chemical Company, Searle & Hereth Company and petitioner are under the same ownership and control. The first named company in 1906 began the manufacture of a liquid preparation which is substantially the same as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. N. K. Fairbank Co. v. R. W. Bell Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by246 opinions

  1. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API