Legal Opinion
Acme Chemical Co. v. Dobkin
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 2, 1946No. Civil Action 5218PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, District Judge.
The complainant instituted this action against the defendant to enjoin and restrain him, his servants, agents and employees, from using the name “Acme Chemical Company” or any similar name incorporating the name “Acme” in the conduct of his business. In addition thereto, the complainant seeks therefor damages from the defendant, and, in addition, to have the defendant account for and pay over to the plaintiff all profits realized by the defendant upon sales of products sold by him while trading as and under the name “Acme Chemical Company.”
The defendant in his answer…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Vogue Co. v. Thompson-Hudson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Gamlen Chemical Co. v. GamlenDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. SklarDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Greyhound Corporation v. RothmanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1949
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ford Insecticide CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.