Legal Opinion

Larey v. Wolfe

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 29, 1967No. 5-4218PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle BkowN, Justice.

Appellee, Jack M. Wolfe1, d/b/a Wolfe Drilling Company, is an oil and gas drilling contractor headquartered in Oklahoma. Two units, or rigs, of his drilling equipment were operating in Arkansas in 1965, and appellant, Arkansas Commissioner of Revenues, assessed a compensating (use) tax against the units. Wolfe paid the assessments under protest. After exhausting Ms administrative remedy, Wolfe successfully prosecuted this action to recover the assessments. The commissioner appeals.

Act 487, Acts of 1949, is the basic compensating tax act. The pertinent section is Ark. Stat.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State of Texas v. Laredo Ice Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. Shell Petroleum Corporation v. CaudleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  4. Rice Oil Co. v. Toole CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. In Re Great Western Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heath v. Research-Cottrell, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  2. Poe v. HousewrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Hervey v. Construction Helicopters, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Heath v. Research-Cottrell, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API