Legal Opinion
Rice Oil Co. v. Toole County
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1930No. 6,512PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway
This action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover from Toole county a portion of the net proceeds tax assessed to plaintiff in the year 1926 on account of oil produced from the tracts of land hereinafter mentioned during the year 1925. The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts and comes here upon defendant’s appeal. Specifications of error are assigned by defendant and cross-assignments by plaintiff.
All the questions presented have been settled by the decisions in Fulton Oil Co. v. Toole County, ante, p. 367, 283 Pac. 769, and Queen City Oil Co. v. Toole County, ante, p. 401,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chambers v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Jackson v. RobySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Mid-Northern Oil Co. v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carter Oil Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- McCabe Petroleum Corp. v. Easement & Right-Of-Way Across Township 12 North, Range 23 EastMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. HGD & J. Min. Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1983
- Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. ComlyWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re Great Western Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.