Legal Opinion

Heath v. Research-Cottrell, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 3, 1975No. 75-104PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elsijane T. Roy, Justice.

Appellee, Research-Cottrell, Inc., under a subcontract agreement with the Bechtel Corporation, contractor for the Arkansas Nuclear 1 Unit of Arkansas Power & Light Company located in Russellville, Arkansas, was engaged to design, furnish and install a natural draft cooling tower for Arkansas Power & Light Company at the nuclear generating power station. After an audit, appellant served appellee with a notice of tax assessment which was upheld in an administrative hearing. Appellee brought a petition for declaratory judgment in the Chancery Court of Pope County,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. C.J.C. Co. v. CheneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Morley v. Brown & Root, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. Ben Pearson, Inc. v. John Rust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Larey v. WolfeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pledger v. C.B. Form Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Ragland v. DumasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. S. H. & J. Drilling Corp. v. QuallsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Aluminum Co. of America v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Southern Steel & Wire Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API