Legal Opinion
Shell Petroleum Corporation v. Caudle
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1933No. 6675PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
The appellees, Caudle and Childs, sued McClanahan and Shell Petroleum Company for labor, for rental of oil well easing returned, and for the value of casing retained in connection with the drilling by Candle and Childs of an oil well on property of Shell, but under a contract made with McClanahan, who was alleged to be in a mining partnership with Shell. We follow the witnesses in thus referring to the Shell Petroleum Company. A mechanic’s lien for the improvement was claimed, but for want of compliance with the statutes it coneededly failed. It was shown that McClanahan…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wagner Supply Co. v. BatemanTexas Supreme Court · 1929
- Munsey v. Mills & GarittyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Buzard & Hilliard v. McAnulty & MostyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Gardner v. WesnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Milburn Manufacturing Co. v. PeakTexas Supreme Court · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ayco Development Corp. v. G. E. T. Service Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Gilbert v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- United States v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
- Carter Oil Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Bynum v. Peoples State Bank of TurkeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.