Legal Opinion

Poe v. Housewright

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1981No. 80-191PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The question here is one of statutory construction. The statutes in question relate to eligibility for parole by inmates.

Charles Joseph Poe was convicted of burglary and grand larceny in 1976 and is serving twenty-one years on those charges. He claims that the Department of Correction determined wrongfully that he is not eligible for parole.

He sued the Department of Correction in Jefferson County Circuit Court, seeking a writ of mandamus. Both parties filed for summary judgment and relied on the same law. If Poe’s interpretation of the law is correct he is entitled to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dozier v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Davis v. MabrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Larey v. WolfeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Shay v. WelchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bosnick v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Abernathy v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Bosnick v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Bosnick v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API