Legal Opinion

Kearney Investment Co. v. Golden Gate Ferry Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1926No. Docket No. S.F. 11000PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

On January 14, 1921, the Kearney Investment Company, as lessor, entered into a written lease with the Golden Gate Ferry Company, as lessee, which written lease covered certain properties fronting on the bay of San Francisco and which admittedly is submerged land.

On August 3, 1921, the Golden Gate Ferry Company served notice in writing on the Kearney Investment Company that the lease entered into on January 14, 1921, was rescinded.

On October 5, 1921, the Kearney Investment Company commenced this action to enforce the payment of rent due under the lease for September and October, 1921, and for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tewksbury v. MagraffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Berton v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Gray v. WhitlaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sands v. Eagle Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Knowles v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Bayshore Sanitary District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Newcomb v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Yuba River Sand Co. v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API