Legal Opinion
Aronson v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 16, 1999PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MIRARCHI, Jr., Senior Judge.
Mark B. Aronson (Aronson) appeals pro se from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) that dismissed his formal complaint against The Peoples Natural Gas Company (Peoples), determining that (1) Peoples’ utility charges are exempted from the disclosure requirement under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667Í, and (2) the public utility services provided by Peoples were adequate and reasonable under Section 1501 of the Public Utility Code, 66 Pa.C.S. § 1501.
The relevant facts found by the administrative law judge (ALJ) and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ferguson v. Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, Tenn.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
- Aronson v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- W.C. McQuaide, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Springfield Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Loma, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Equitable Gas Co. v. WadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- United States Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.