Legal Opinion
United States Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 12, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.1
United States Steel Corporation (U.S.Steel) petitions from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) granting Duquesne Light Company’s (Duquesne) petition and concluding, inter alia, that a Generation Avoidance Energy (GAE) provision in Du-quesne’s High Voltage Power Service (HVPS) rate class does not violate the rate cap protections in Section 2804(4)(ii) of the Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act (Competition Act), 66 Pa.C.S. § 2804(4)(ii).2
Duquesne is a Commission-regulated public utility that transmits and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- George v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Byer v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Aronson v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- County of Erie v. Verizon North, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- UGI Utilities, Inc.—Gas Division v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- UGI Utilities, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Equitable Gas Co. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.