Legal Opinion
Springfield Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 17, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MIRARCHI, Senior Judge.
Springfield Township (Township) appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which dismissed the Township’s complaint against the PECO Energy Company (PECO), formerly the Philadelphia Electric Company, and denied the Township’s request for a refund of portion of electric bills paid from July 4,1986 to July 6, 1993.
The relevant facts found by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and PUC are as follows. In 1970, the Department of Transportation (DOT) installed seventy photoelec-trieally-controlled sodium vapor street lighting fixtures…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brockway Glass Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Equitable Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Pennsylvania Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- W.C. McQuaide, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Exxon Pipeline v. La Public Service Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Aronson v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Romeo v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Pook v. Commonwealth, State Board of Auctioneer ExaminersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.