Legal Opinion

Loma, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 5, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MIRARCHI, Jr., Senior Judge.

Loma, Inc., Corporate Livery, Inc., Elite Industries, Inc. and J & J Leasing & Rentals, Inc. (collectively, Objectors) appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) approving a transfer of a certificate of public convenience.

The issues raised on appeal are: (1) whether a certificate of public convenience is “property” subject to a federal tax lien statute; (2) whether the Objectors have standing to claim a wrongful levy of the certificate by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS); (3) whether the PUC has jurisdiction to decide *427the validity of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Maria Elisa Rodriguez v. Escambron Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  5. 1412 Spruce, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aronson v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Lehigh Valley Transportation Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Mapemawa, Inc. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Rosemont Taxicab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API