Legal Opinion

Chapnitsky v. McClone

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1963PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

Plaintiff appellant contends on this appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court committed prejudicial error in these respects:(1) In admitting in evidence hospital records and X rays without proper authentication as prescribed by sec. 327.25, Stats. 1961.(2) In sustaining objections to two questions put to Dr.. Marshall, plaintiffs medical expert, during redirect examination.(3) In submitting Question No. 5 of the special verdict.(4) In framing Question No. 6 of the special verdict in such manner that the jury was directed not to answer the subdivisions thereof so as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Sundquist v. Madison Railways Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. SundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Kreyer v. FARMERS'CO-OPERATIVE LUMBER CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of Biddeford Ex Rel. Board of Education v. Biddeford Teachers Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Merlino v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Vinicky v. Midland Mutual Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Milbauer v. Transport Employes' Mutual Benefit SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API