Legal Opinion
Farmers Cooperative Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 20, 2011No. 09-741 LPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*580 ORDER
EDWARD J. DAMICH, Judge.
In this “rails-to-trails” case, Plaintiffs have filed a motion for reconsideration and/or clarification of the court’s June 24, 2011, opinion (“Pis.’ Mot.”) finding Defendant liable for a taking of Plaintiffs’ property but only for the periods beginning with the issuance of the first NITU through the expiration of a series of NITUs regarding either of the two rail corridors at issue. Plaintiffs’ motion also asks leave of the court for authorization to take discovery depositions of officials of the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) and of K & 0 Railroad (“K &…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Barclay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Ladd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Caquelin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Ladd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Balagna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Cully Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Cully Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.