Legal Opinion

Farmco, Inc. v. Explosive Specialists, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 14, 1984No. 55,318PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abbott, J.:

The trial court awarded attorney fees against two insurance carriers in a garnishment action pursuant to K.S.A. 40-256 and K.S.A. 40-2004. The insurance carriers appeal generally, arguing that 40-256 and 40-2004 do not apply to a garnishment action and that the trial court erred by awarding attorney fees based solely on a contingency fee contract between plaintiff and its counsel.

The plaintiff is Farmco, Inc., which contracted to have work done requiring the use of explosives. Farmco required its contractor to furnish a certificate of insurance covering any damage to its property…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Gilley Ex Rel. Gilley v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Bell v. TiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Herrig v. HerrigWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Westhoff Sand Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Smith v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  4. Moses v. HalsteadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Beck v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API