Legal Opinion

Bell v. Tilton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 2, 1983No. 55,460PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

Plaintiff-garnisher Christopher Bell appeals dismissal of his garnishment action against garnishee Great Plains Mutual Insurance Co., Inc.

The background facts as found by the trial court are summarized as follows:

Great Plains Mutual Insurance Company issued its homeowners policy No. H-l-331-2 to Rodney and Katherine Tilton which generally provided liability limits of $25,000.00 for bodily injuries or property damage caused by a covered occurrence. Defendant, Russell Wayne Tilton (Rusty), is the son of Rodney and Katherine Tilton, and was…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Spruill Motors, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Cowan v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Clark v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Park University Enterprises, Inc. v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Patrons Mutual Insurance v. Kerl Ex Rel. HarmonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. First Financial Insurance v. BuggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. Elmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Morrison Grain Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API