Legal Opinion
Pike v. Caldera
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 7, 1999No. IP 98-0204-C-T/GPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY DISCUSSING PENDING MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND MOTIONS FOR LEAVE
TINDER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This Entry rules on the majority of the pending motions to strike and both of the' pending motions for leave. Each of the motions relate in some way to the proper interpretation and application of Southern District of Indiana Local Rule 56.1 (“Local Rule 56.1” or “L.R. 56.1”), as amended December 17, 1998.1 In this case, the parties have engaged in extensive and time-consuming satellite litigation over various portions of the amended rule; in this Entry, the court discusses these portions of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Robert WALLACE, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMC PNEUMATICS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Darlene Jenkins v. George W. Heintz and Bowman, Heintz, Boscia & McPheeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Autotech Technologies Ltd. Partnership v. Automationdirect.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Monco v. Zoltek Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Williams v. United Technologies Carrier Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2004
- Chaib v. Geo Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.