Legal Opinion

Williams v. United Technologies Carrier Corp.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 25, 2004No. 1:02-cv-01036PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BAKER, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction.

After his termination due to a reduction-in-force (“RIF”), Theo Williams filed for bankruptcy protection and then sued his former employer, United Technologies Carrier Corp. (“Carrier”), alleging discrimination because of his race in violation of Title VII. 1 In response, Carrier filed counterclaims alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and conversion. Carrier filed a motion for summary judgment, both with respect to Williams’ discrimination claim and its own counterclaims. Williams…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. Foothill Mountain, Inc. (In Re Hopkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  2. Olayan v. HolderDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011
  3. In Re KentUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
  4. Metal Forming Technologies, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2004
  5. Yelverton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API